Legislature(1997 - 1998)
1997-02-12 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1997-02-12 Senate Journal Page 0304 SB 74 Senator Pearce requested that the reconsideration on CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 74(FIN) An Act making appropriations concerning the states position on the sovereign powers of Native tribal governments in the state; and providing for an effective date be taken up. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 74(FIN) was before the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Hoffman moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 2. Senator Taylor objected, then withdrew his objection. There being no further objections, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Hoffman offered Amendment No. 2 : Page 1: Delete lines 9-13. Senator Hoffman moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 2. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 74(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Nays: Donley, Green, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Excused: Halford 1997-02-12 Senate Journal Page 0305 SB 74 and so, Amendment No. 2 failed. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 74(FIN) was automatically in third reading. The question to be reconsidered: Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 74(FIN) An Act making appropriations concerning the states position on the sovereign powers of Native tribal governments in the state; and providing for an effective date pass the Senate? The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 74(FIN) Third Reading - On Reconsideration Effective Date YEAS: 14 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Kelly, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln Excused: Halford and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 74(FIN) passed the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.